trade secret misappropriation
Miss this issue, and a business can lose its edge overnight while an employee, contractor, or competitor wrongly assumes "confidential" and "illegal to use" mean the same thing. Trade secret misappropriation is the improper acquisition, use, or disclosure of valuable nonpublic information - such as formulas, customer lists, pricing strategies, source code, or manufacturing methods - when that information is protected as a trade secret. The catch many people miss: not every secret counts. The information must have economic value because it is not generally known, and the owner must take reasonable steps to keep it secret.
That matters because bad advice often goes in both directions. Some people think copying files is required; it is not. Misappropriation can happen through downloading, sharing, memorizing, or exploiting information obtained through a breach of confidence, theft, or espionage. Others assume any workplace know-how belongs to the company forever; that is also wrong. General skill and experience usually are not trade secrets.
In South Dakota, claims are commonly brought under the South Dakota Uniform Trade Secrets Act, codified at SDCL chapter 37-29, and some cases also involve the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016. A misappropriation claim can support injunctive relief, money damages for actual loss and unjust enrichment, and sometimes attorney's fees for willful misconduct. For anyone evaluating a business-loss claim, the real question is not "Was it secret?" but "Was it legally protected, and was it taken or used unfairly?"
The information above is educational and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every injury case turns on its own facts. If you're dealing with this right now, get a professional opinion.
Find out what your case is worth →